·
Global warming is the observed
century-scale rise in the average temperature of Earth's climate system.
·
Since 1971, 90% of the increased energy has
been stored in the oceans, mostly in the 0 to 700m region.
·
Despite the oceans' dominant role in energy
storage, the term "global warming" is also used to refer to increases
in average temperature of the air and sea at Earth's surface.
·
Since the early 20th century, the global
air and sea surface
temperature has increased about 0.8 °C (1.4 °F), with
about two-thirds of the increase occurring since 1980.
·
Each of the last three decades has been
successively warmer at the Earth's surface than any preceding decade since
1850.
·
Scientific understanding of the cause of
global warming has been increasing.
·
In 2010 that finding was recognized by the
national science academies of all major industrialized nations.
·
Its 2013 report states:
·
This evidence for human influence has grown
since AR4.
·
It is extremely likely (95-100%) that human
influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the
mid-20th century. - IPCC AR5 WG1 Summary for Policymakers
·
They indicated that during the 21st century
the global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 0.3 to 1.7 °C
(0.5 to 3.1 °F) for their lowest emissions
scenario using stringent mitigation and 2.6 to 4.8 °C (4.7
to 8.6 °F) for their highest.
·
Future climate change and associated
impacts will vary from region
to region around the globe.
·
Parties to the UNFCCC have adopted a range
of policies designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to assist in adaptation to
global warming.
·
Parties to the UNFCCC have agreed that deep
cuts in emissions are required, and that future global warming should be
limited to below 2.0 °C (3.6 °F) relative to the pre-industrial
level.
·
Emissions of greenhouse gases grew 2.2% per
year between 2000 and 2010, compared with 1.3% per year from 1970 to 2000.[33] China currently leads the
world in global CO2 emissions.
Observed temperature changes
·
The rate of warming over the last half of
that period was almost double that for the period as a whole (0.13±0.03 °C per
decade, versus 0.07±0.02 °C per decade).
·
The warming that is evident in the
instrumental temperature record is consistent with a wide range of
observations, as documented by many independent scientific groups.
·
The probability that these changes could have
occurred by chance is virtually zero.
·
Estimates by the Climatic Research
Unit (CRU) show 2005 as the second warmest year, behind 1998
with 2003 and 2010 tied for third warmest year, however, "the error
estimate for individual years ... is at least ten times larger than the
differences between these three years.
·
The World
Meteorological Organization (WMO) WMO statement on the
status of the global climate in 2010 explains that, "The 2010
nominal value of +0.53 °C ranks just ahead of those of 2005 (+0.52 °C)
and 1998 (+0.51 °C), although the differences between the three years are
not statistically significant..." Every year from 1986 to 2013 has
seen annual average global land and ocean surface temperatures above the 1961–1990
average.
·
Surface temperatures in 1998 were unusually
warm because global temperatures are affected by the El
Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and the strongest El Niño in
the past century occurred during that year.
·
Global temperature is subject to short-term
fluctuations that overlay long term trends and can temporarily mask them. The
relative stability in surface temperature from 2002 to 2009—which has been
dubbed the global warming hiatus by
the media and some scientists— is consistent with such an episode.
·
2010 was also an El Niño year.
·
On the low swing of the oscillation, 2011
as a La Niña year was cooler but it was still
the 11th warmest year since records began in 1880.
·
Of the 13 warmest years since 1880, 11 were
the years from 2001 to 2011. Over the more recent record, 2011 was the warmest
La Niña year in the period from 1950 to 2011, and was close to 1997 which was
not at the lowest point of the cycle.
·
Temperature changes vary over the globe.
Since 1979, land temperatures have increased about twice as fast as ocean
temperatures (0.25 °C per decade against 0.13 °C per
decade).
·
Ocean temperatures increase more slowly
than land temperatures because of the larger effective heat capacity of the
oceans and because the ocean loses more heat by evaporation.
·
The northern hemisphere is
also naturally warmer than the southern hemisphere mainly
because of meridional heat
transport in the oceans which has a differential of about 0.9 petawatts northwards, with an
additional contribution from the albedo differences between the polar regions. Since
the beginning of industrialisation the temperature difference between the
hemispheres has increased due to melting of sea ice and snow in the North.
·
Average arctic temperatures have been
increasing at almost twice the rate of the rest of the world in the past 100
years; however arctic temperatures are also highly variable.
·
Although more greenhouse gases are emitted
in the Northern than Southern Hemisphere this does not contribute to the
difference in warming because the major greenhouse gases persist long enough to
mix between hemispheres.
·
The thermal inertia of
the oceans and slow responses of other indirect effects mean that climate can
take centuries or longer to adjust to changes in forcing.
·
Climate commitmentstudies
indicate that even if greenhouse gases were stabilized at year 2000 levels, a
further warming of about 0.5 °C (0.9 °F) would still occur.
Initial causes of temperature changes (external forcings)
·
The climate system can respond to changes
in external forcings.
·
External forcings can "push" the
climate in the direction of warming or cooling.
Greenhouse
gases
·
Annual world greenhouse gas emissions, in
2010, by sector.
·
Percentage share of global cumulative
energy-related CO
2 emissions between 1751 and 2012 across different regions.
·
On Earth, naturally occurring amounts of
greenhouse gases have a mean warming effect of about 33 °C (59 °F).
·
Without the Earth's atmosphere, the
temperature across almost the entire surface of the Earth would be below
freezing.
·
The major greenhouse gases are water vapor, which causes about 36–70% of the
greenhouse effect; carbon dioxide (CO2),
which causes 9–26%; methane(CH4),
which causes 4–9%; and ozone (O3),
which causes 3–7%.
·
Clouds also affect the radiation balance
through cloud forcings similar
to greenhouse gases.
·
Human activity since the Industrial Revolution has
increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, leading to
increased radiative forcing from CO2, methane, tropospheric ozone, CFCs andnitrous oxide. According to work published in
2007, the concentrations of
CO2 and methane have increased by 36% and 148% respectively
since 1750.
·
These levels are much higher than at any
time during the last 800,000 years, the period for which reliable data has been
extracted from ice cores.
·
Less direct geological evidence indicates
that CO2 values higher than this were last seen about 20
million years ago.
·
Fossil fuel burning has produced about
three-quarters of the increase in CO2 from human activity over
the past 20 years. The rest of this increase is caused mostly by changes in
land-use, particularly deforestation.
·
Estimates of global CO2 emissions
in 2011 from fossil fuel combustion, including cement production and gas
flaring, was 34.8 billion tonnes (9.5 ± 0.5 PgC), an increase of 54% above
emissions in 1990. Coal burning was responsible for 43% of the total emissions,
oil 34%, gas 18%, cement 4.9% and gas flaring 0.7% .
·
In May 2013, it was reported that readings
for CO2 taken at the world's primary benchmark site in Mauna Loa surpassed
400 ppm. According
to professor Brian Hoskins,
this is likely the first time CO2 levels have been this high
for about 4.5 million years.
·
Over the last three decades of the 20th
century, gross domestic product per capita and population growth were the main drivers
of increases in greenhouse gas emissions.
·
CO2emissions are continuing to
rise due to the burning of fossil fuels and land-use change.
·
Attribution of emissions due to land-use
change is a controversial issue.
·
In most scenarios, emissions continue to
rise over the century, while in a few, emissions are reduced.
·
Fossil fuel reserves are abundant, and will
not limit carbon emissions in the 21st century.
·
Emission scenarios, combined with modelling
of the carbon cycle, have
been used to produce estimates of how atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse
gases might change in the future.
·
Using the six IPCC SRES "marker"
scenarios, models suggest that by the year 2100, the atmospheric concentration
of CO2 could range between 541 and 970 ppm.
·
This is 90–250% above the concentration in
the year 1750.
·
The popular media and the public often confuse
global warming with ozone depletion,
i.e., the destruction of stratospheric ozone by chlorofluorocarbons.
·
Although there are a few areas of linkage,
the relationship between the two is not strong. Reduced stratospheric ozone has
had a slight cooling influence on surface temperatures, while increasedtropospheric ozone has
had a somewhat larger warming effect.
Particulates
and soot
·
Global dimming, a gradual reduction in the
amount of global direct irradiance at the
Earth's surface, was observed from 1961 until at least 1990.
·
The main cause of this dimming is
particulates produced by volcanoes and human made pollutants, which exerts a cooling effect by
increasing the reflection of incoming sunlight.
·
The effects of the products of fossil fuel
combustion – CO2 and aerosols – have partially offset
one another in recent decades, so that net warming has been due to the increase
in non-CO2 greenhouse gases such as methane.
·
Radiative forcing due to particulates is
temporally limited due to wet deposition which causes them to have
an atmospheric lifetime of
one week. Carbon dioxide has a lifetime of a century or more, and as such,
changes in particulate concentrations will only delay climate changes due to
carbon dioxide.
·
Black carbon is second only to carbon
dioxide for its contribution to global warming.
·
In addition to their direct effect by
scattering and absorbing solar radiation, particulates have indirect effects on
the Earth's radiation
budget.
·
Sulfates act as cloud
condensation nuclei and thus lead to clouds that have more and
smaller cloud droplets. These clouds reflect solar radiation more efficiently
than clouds with fewer and larger droplets, known as the Twomey effect.
·
This effect also causes droplets to be of
more uniform size, which reduces growth of raindrops and
makes the cloud more reflective to incoming sunlight, known as the Albrecht effect.
·
Indirect effects are most noticeable in
marine stratiform clouds, and have very little radiative effect on convective
clouds. Indirect effects of particulates represent the largest uncertainty in
radiative forcing.
·
Soot may cool or warm
the surface, depending on whether it is airborne or deposited. Atmospheric soot
directly absorbs solar radiation, which heats the atmosphere and cools the
surface.
·
In isolated areas with high soot
production, such as rural India, as much as 50% of surface warming due to
greenhouse gases may be masked by atmospheric brown
clouds.
·
When deposited, especially on glaciers or
on ice in arctic regions, the lower surface albedo can also directly heat the surface.
·
The influences of particulates, including
black carbon, are most pronounced in the tropics and sub-tropics, particularly
in Asia, while the effects of greenhouse gases are dominant in the extratropics
and southern hemisphere.
Solar
activity
·
These measurements indicate that the Sun's
output has not increased since 1978, so the warming during the past 30 years
cannot be attributed to an increase in solar energy reaching the Earth.
·
Climate models have been used to examine
the role of the sun in recent climate change.
·
Models are unable to reproduce the rapid
warming observed in recent decades when they only take into account variations
in solar output and volcanic activity. Models are, however, able to simulate
the observed 20th century changes in temperature when they include all of the
most important external forcings, including human influences and natural
forcings.
·
Another line of evidence against the sun
having caused recent climate change comes from looking at how temperatures at
different levels in the Earth's atmosphere have changed.
·
Models and observations show that
greenhouse warming results in warming of the lower atmosphere (called the troposphere) but cooling of the upper
atmosphere (called the stratosphere).
·
Depletion of the ozone layer by chemical refrigerants has also resulted in a
strong cooling effect in the stratosphere. If the sun were responsible for
observed warming, warming of both the troposphere and stratosphere would be
expected.
·
Sea ice, shown here in Nunavut, in northern Canada, reflects more
sunshine, while open ocean absorbs more, accelerating melting.
·
The climate system includes a range of feedbacks,
which alter the response of the system to changes in external forcings.
·
Positive feedbacks increase the response of
the climate system to an initial forcing, while negative feedbacks reduce the
response of the climate system to an initial forcing.
·
There are a range of feedbacks in the
climate system, including water vapor,
changes in ice-albedo(snow
and ice cover affect how much the Earth's surface absorbs or reflects incoming
sunlight), clouds, and changes in the Earth's carbon cycle (e.g., the release of carbon
from soil).
·
Feedbacks are an important factor in
determining the sensitivity of the climate system to increased atmospheric
greenhouse gas concentrations.
·
Other factors being equal, a higher climate sensitivity means
that more warming will occur for a given increase in greenhouse gas forcing.
·
Uncertainty over the effect of feedbacks is
a major reason why different climate models project different magnitudes of
warming for a given forcing scenario. More research is needed to understand the
role of clouds and carbon cycle feedbacks in climate projections.
·
The IPCC projections given in the lede span
the "likely" range (greater than 66% probability, based on expert
judgement) for the selected emissions scenarios.
·
However, the IPCC's projections do not
reflect the full range of uncertainty.
·
The lower end of the "likely"
range appears to be better constrained than the upper end of the
"likely" range.
·
The models take into account various
components, such as local air movement, temperature, clouds, and other
atmospheric properties; ocean temperature, salt content, and circulation; ice cover on land and sea; the
transfer of heat and moisture from soil and vegetation to the atmosphere;
chemical and biological processes; solar variability and others.
·
Although researchers attempt to include as
many processes as possible, simplifications of the actual climate system are
inevitable because of the constraints of available computer power and
limitations in knowledge of the climate system.
·
Results from models can also vary due to
different greenhouse gas inputs and the model's climate sensitivity.
·
For example, the uncertainty in IPCC's 2007
projections is caused by the use of
multiple models with differing sensitivity to
greenhouse gas concentrations, the use of differing estimates
of humanities' future greenhouse gas emissions, any additional emissions from climate
feedbacks that were not included in the models IPCC used to prepare its report,
i.e., greenhouse gas releases from permafrost.
·
The models do not assume the climate will
warm due to increasing levels of greenhouse gases. Instead the models predict
how greenhouse gases will interact with radiative transfer and other physical
processes.
·
One of the mathematical results of these
complex equations is a prediction whether warming or cooling will occur.
·
Recent research has called special
attention to the need to refine models with respect to the effect of clouds and
the carbon cycle.
·
Models are also used to help investigate
the causes
of recent climate change by comparing the observed changes to
those that the models project from various natural and human-derived causes.
·
Although these models do not unambiguously
attribute the warming that occurred from approximately 1910 to 1945 to either
natural variation or human effects, they do indicate that the warming since
1970 is dominated by man-made greenhouse gas emissions.
·
The physical realism of models is tested by
examining their ability to simulate contemporary or past climates.
·
Climate models produce a good match to
observations of global temperature changes over the last century, but do not
simulate all aspects of climate.
·
Precipitation increased proportional to
atmospheric humidity, and hence significantly faster than global climate models
predict.
Observed and expected environmental effects
·
"Detection" is the process of
demonstrating that climate has changed in some defined statistical sense, without providing a
reason for that change.
·
Detection does not imply attribution of the
detected change to a particular cause.
·
"Attribution" of causes of
climate change is the process of establishing the most likely causes for the
detected change with some defined level of confidence.
·
Detection and attribution may also be
applied to observed changes in physical, ecological and social systems.
Natural
systems
·
Global warming has been detected in a
number of natural systems. Some of these changes are described in the section
on observed temperature changes,
e.g., sea level rise and
widespread decreases in snow and ice extent.
·
Anthropogenic forcing has likely
contributed to some of the observed changes, including sea level rise, changes
in climate extremes (such
as the number of warm and cold days), declines in Arctic sea ice extent, and to glacier
retreat.
·
Over the 21st century, the IPCC projects
that global mean sea level could
rise by 0.18–0.59 m.
·
The IPCC do not provide a best estimate of
global mean sea level rise, and their upper estimate of 59 cm is not an
upper-bound, i.e., global mean sea level could rise by more than 59 cm by
2100.
·
The IPCC's projections are conservative,
and may underestimate future sea level rise.
·
Over the 21st century, Parris and others] suggest that global mean sea
level could rise by 0.2 to 2.0 m (0.7–6.6 ft), relative to mean sea level
in 1992.
·
Widespread coastal flooding would be expected if
several degrees of warming is sustained for millennia.
·
For example, sustained global warming of
more than 2 °C (relative to pre-industrial levels) could lead to eventual
sea level rise of around 1 to 4 m due to thermal expansion of sea water and the
melting of glaciers and small ice caps.
·
Melting of the Greenland ice sheet could
contribute an additional 4 to 7.5 m over many thousands of years.
·
Changes in regional climate are expected to
include greater warming over land, with most warming at high northern latitudes, and least warming over the Southern Ocean and parts of the North
Atlantic Ocean.
·
During the 21st century, glaciers and snow cover are
projected to continue their widespread retreat. Projections of declines in
Arctic sea ice vary.
·
Recent projections suggest that Arctic
summers could be ice-free (defined as ice extent less than 1 million square km) as early as 2025-2030.
Ecological
systems
·
In terrestrial ecosystems, the earlier timing of spring
events, and poleward and upward shifts in plant and animal ranges, have been
linked with high confidence to recent warming.
·
It is expected that most ecosystems will be
affected by higher atmospheric CO2 levels, combined with higher
global temperatures.
·
Overall, it is expected that climate change
will result in the extinction of many
species and reduced diversity of ecosystems.
·
Increases in atmospheric CO2 concentrations
have led to an increase in ocean acidity.
·
Dissolved CO2 increases
ocean acidity, which is measured by lower pH values.
·
Between 1750 to 2000, surface-ocean pH has
decreased by ≈0.1, from ≈8.2 to ≈8.1.
·
Surface-ocean pH has probably not been
below ≈8.1 during the past 2 million years.
·
Projections suggest that surface-ocean pH
could decrease by an additional 0.3–0.4 units by 2100.
Long-term
effects
·
On the timescale of centuries to millennia,
the magnitude of global warming will be determined primarily by anthropogenic
CO2 emissions.
·
This is due to carbon dioxide's very long
lifetime in the atmosphere.
·
Stabilizing global average temperature
would require reductions in anthropogenic CO2 emissions.
·
Reductions in emissions of non-CO2 anthropogenic
GHGs (e.g., methane and nitrous oxide) would also be necessary.
·
For CO2, anthropogenic emissions
would need to be reduced by more than 80% relative to their peak level.
·
Even if this were to be achieved, global
average temperatures would remain close to their highest level for many
centuries.
Large-scale
and abrupt impacts
·
Some large-scale changes could occur abruptly,
i.e., over a short time period, and might also be irreversible.
·
Scientific understanding of abrupt climate
change is generally poor.
·
However, the probability of abrupt changes
appears to be very low.
·
Factors that may increase the probability
of abrupt climate change include higher magnitudes of global warming, warming
that occurs more rapidly, and warming that is sustained over longer time
periods.
Observed and expected effects on social systems
·
Production of wheat and maize globally has
been impacted by climate change. While crop production has increased in some
mid-latitude regions such as the UK and Northeast China, economic losses due toextreme weather events have increased
globally.
·
There has been a shift from cold- to
heat-related mortality in some regions as a result of warming. Livelihoods of indigenous peoples of
the Arctic have been altered by climate change, and there is
emerging evidence of climate change impacts on livelihoods of indigenous peoples in
other regions.
·
Regional impacts of climate change are now observable
at more locations than before, on all continents and across ocean regions.
·
The future social impacts of climate change
will be uneven.
·
Many risks are expected to increase with
higher magnitudes of global warming.
·
All regions are at risk of experiencing
negative impacts.
·
Low-latitude, less developed areas face the
greatest risk.
·
Examples of impacts include:
·
Food: Crop production will probably be
negatively affected in low latitude countries, while effects at northern
latitudes may be positive or negative.
·
Global warming of around 4.6 °C
relative to pre-industrial levels could pose a large risk to global and
regional food security.
·
Health: Generally impacts will
be more negative than positive.
·
Impacts
include: the effects of extreme weather, leading to injury and loss of life; and
indirect effects, such as undernutrition brought on by crop failures.
Habitat
inundation
·
In small islands and mega deltas, inundation as a result of sea level rise
is expected to threaten vital infrastructure and human settlements.
Proposed policy responses to global warming
·
There are different views over what the
appropriate policy response to climate change should be.
·
These competing views weigh the benefits of
limiting emissions of greenhouse gases against the costs. In general, it seems
likely that climate change will impose greater damages and risks in poorer
regions.
Mitigation
·
Reducing the amount of future climate
change is called mitigation of
climate change.
·
The IPCC defines mitigation as activities
that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, or enhance the capacity of carbon sinks to absorb GHGs from the
atmosphere.
·
Climate mitigation also includes acts to
enhance natural sinks, such as reforestation.
·
In order to limit warming to within the
lower range described in the IPCC's "Summary Report for Policymakers"
it will be necessary to adopt policies that will limit greenhouse gas emissions
to one of several significantly different scenarios described in the full
report.
·
This will become more and more difficult
with each year of increasing volumes of emissions and even more drastic
measures will be required in later years to stabilize a desired atmospheric
concentration of greenhouse gases.
·
Energy-related carbon-dioxide (CO2)
emissions in 2010 were the highest in history, breaking the prior record set in
2008.
Adaptation
·
Other policy responses include adaptation to
climate change. Adaptation to climate change may be planned, either in reaction
to or anticipation of climate change, or spontaneous, i.e., without government
intervention.
·
Planned adaptation is already occurring on
a limited basis
·
The barriers, limits, and costs of future
adaptation are not fully understood.
·
A concept related to adaptation is "adaptive capacity", which is the ability
of a system (human, natural or managed) to adjust to climate change (including
climate variability and extremes) to moderate potential damages, to take
advantage of opportunities, or to cope with consequences.
·
Unmitigated climate change (i.e., future
climate change without efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions) would, in the
long term, be likely to exceed the capacity of natural, managed and human
systems to adapt.
·
Environmental organizations and public
figures have emphasized changes in the climate and the risks they entail, while
promoting adaptation to changes in infrastructural needs and emissions
reductions.
Climate engineering
·
Climate engineering (sometimes called by
the more expansive term 'geoengineering'), is the deliberate modification of
the climate. It has been investigated as a possible response to global warming,
e.g. by NASA] and the Royal Society.
·
A study from 2014 investigated the most common
climate engineering methods and concluded they are either ineffective or have
potentially severe side effects and cannot be stopped without causing rapid
climate change.
Discourse about global warming
Political
discussion
·
The ultimate objective of the Convention is
to prevent dangerous human interference of the climate system.
·
As is stated in the Convention, this
requires that GHG concentrations are stabilized in the atmosphere at a level
where ecosystems can
adapt naturally to climate change, food
production is not threatened, and economic
development can proceed in a sustainable fashion.
·
The Framework Convention was agreed in
1992, but since then, global emissions have risen.
·
During negotiations, the G77 (a lobbying group in the United
Nations representing 133 developing nations) pushed for a mandate
requiring developed countries to "[take] the lead" in reducing their
emissions.
·
This was justified on the basis that: the
developed world's emissions had contributed most to the stock of
GHGs in the atmosphere; per-capita emissions (i.e.,
emissions per head of population) were still relatively low in developing
countries; and the emissions of developing countries would grow to meet their
development needs.
·
This mandate was sustained in the Kyoto Protocol to the Framework
Convention, which entered into legal effect in 2005.
·
In ratifying the Kyoto Protocol, most
developed countries accepted legally binding commitments to limit their
emissions.
·
These first-round commitments expired in
2012.
·
US President George W. Bush rejected the treaty on the
basis that "it exempts 80% of the world, including major population
centers such as China and India, from compliance, and would cause serious harm
to the US economy."
·
Parties associated with the Accord (140
countries, as of November 2010) aim to limit the future increase in global mean
temperature to below 2 °C.
·
A preliminary assessment published in November
2010 by the United
Nations Environment Programme(UNEP) suggests a possible
"emissions gap" between the voluntary pledges made in the Accord and
the emissions cuts necessary to have a "likely" (greater than 66%
probability) chance of meeting the 2 °C objective.
·
The UNEP assessment takes the 2 °C objective
as being measured against the pre-industrial global mean temperature level.
·
To having a likely chance of meeting the 2 °C objective,
assessed studies generally indicated the need for global emissions to peak
before 2020, with substantial declines in emissions thereafter.
·
It produced an agreement, not a binding
treaty, that the Parties should take urgent action to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions to meet a goal of limiting global warming to 2 °C above
pre-industrial temperatures.
·
It also recognized the need to consider
strengthening the goal to a global average rise of 1.5 °C.
Scientific discussion
·
Most scientists agree that humans are
contributing to observed climate change.
·
A meta study of academic papers concerning
global warming, published between 1991 and 2011 and accessible from Web of Knowledge, found that among those whose
abstracts expressed a position on the cause of global warming, 97.2% supported
the consensus view that it is man made.
·
In an October 2011 paper published in the International Journal of Public Opinion Research,
researchers from George Mason University analyzed the results of a survey of
489 American scientists working in academia, government, and industry.
·
Of those surveyed, 97% agreed that that
global temperatures have risen over the past century and 84% agreed that
"human-induced greenhouse warming" is now occurring, only 5%
disagreeing that human activity is a significant cause of global warming.
·
National science academies have called on
world leaders for policies to cut global emissions.
·
In the scientific literature, there is a strong
consensus that global surface temperatures have increased in
recent decades and that the trend is caused mainly by human-induced emissions
of greenhouse gases.
Discussion
by the public and in popular media
·
The global warming
controversy refers to a variety of disputes, substantially more
pronounced in the popular
media than in the scientific literature, regarding the nature,
causes, and consequences of global warming.
·
Additional disputes concern estimates of climate sensitivity,
predictions of additional warming, and what the consequences of global warming
will be.
·
From 1990–1997 in the United States, conservative think
tanks mobilized to challenge the legitimacy of global warming as a social
problem.
·
Some people dispute aspects of climate
change science.
·
Some fossil fuel companies have scaled back
their efforts in recent years, or called for policies to reduce global
warming.
Surveys
of public opinion
·
Researchers at the University of Michigan
have found that the public's belief as to the causes of global warming depends
on the wording choice used in the
polls.
·
Over a third of the world's population was
unaware of global warming, with people in developing countries less aware than
those in developed, and
those in Africa the least aware.
·
Of those aware, Latin America leads in
belief that temperature changes are a result of human activities while Africa,
parts of Asia and the Middle East, and a few countries from the Former Soviet
Union lead in the opposite belief. There is a significant contrast of the
opinions of the concept and the appropriate response between Europe and the
United States.
·
Nick Pidgeon of Cardiff University said
that "results show the different stages of engagement about global warming
on each side of the Atlantic", adding, "The debate in Europe is about
what action needs to be taken, while many in the US still debate whether
climate change is happening."
·
A 2010 poll by the Office for
National Statistics found that 75% of UK respondents were at
least "fairly convinced" that the world's climate is changing,
compared to 87% in a similar survey in 2006.
·
A January 2011 ICM poll in the UK found 83% of
respondents viewed climate change as a current or imminent threat, while 14%
said it was no threat. Opinion was unchanged from an August 2009 poll asking
the same question, though there had been a slight polarisation of opposing
views.
·
By 2010, with 111 countries surveyed,
Gallup determined that there was a substantial decrease in the number of
Americans and Europeans who viewed global warming as a serious threat.
·
In the US, a little over half the population
(53%) now viewed it as a serious concern for either themselves or their
families; this was 10% below the 2008 poll (63%). Latin America had the biggest
rise in concern, with 73% saying global warming was a serious threat to their
families.
·
That global poll also found that people are
more likely to attribute global warming to human activities than to natural
causes, except in the USA where nearly half (47%) of the population attributed
global warming to natural causes.
·
According to 54% of those questioned,
global warming featured top of the perceived global threats.
·
In a January 2013 survey, Pew found that
69% of Americans say there is solid evidence that the Earth's average
temperature has been getting warmer over the past few decades, up six points
since November 2011 and 12 points since 2009.
·
According to Erik M. Conway, global warming became
the dominant popular term after June 1988, when NASA climate scientist James Hansen used the term in a testimony
to Congress
·
when he said: "global warming has
reached a level such that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a
cause and effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and the observed
warming."
·
Conway claims that this testimony was
widely reported in the media and subsequently global warming became
the commonly used term by both the press and in public discourse.
·
However, he also points out that
"global climate change" is the more scientifically accurate term,
because changes in Earth systems are not limited to surface temperatures.
Natural
systems
·
Global warming has been detected in a
number of natural systems. Some of these changes are described in the section
on observed temperature changes,
e.g., sea level rise and
widespread decreases in snow and ice extent.
·
Anthropogenic forcing has likely
contributed to some of the observed changes, including sea level rise, changes
in climate extremes (such
as the number of warm and cold days), declines in Arctic sea ice extent, and to glacier
retreat.
·
Over the 21st century, the IPCC projects
that global mean sea level could
rise by 0.18–0.59 m.
·
The IPCC do not provide a best estimate of
global mean sea level rise, and their upper estimate of 59 cm is not an
upper-bound, i.e., global mean sea level could rise by more than 59 cm by
2100.
·
The IPCC's projections are conservative,
and may underestimate future sea level rise.
·
Over the 21st century, Parris and others] suggest that global mean sea
level could rise by 0.2 to 2.0 m (0.7–6.6 ft), relative to mean sea level
in 1992.
·
Widespread coastal flooding would be expected if
several degrees of warming is sustained for millennia.
·
For example, sustained global warming of
more than 2 °C (relative to pre-industrial levels) could lead to eventual
sea level rise of around 1 to 4 m due to thermal expansion of sea water and the
melting of glaciers and small ice caps.
·
Melting of the Greenland ice sheet could
contribute an additional 4 to 7.5 m over many thousands of years.
·
Changes in regional climate are expected to
include greater warming over land, with most warming at high northern latitudes, and least warming over the Southern Ocean and parts of the North
Atlantic Ocean.
·
During the 21st century, glaciers and snow cover are
projected to continue their widespread retreat. Projections of declines in
Arctic sea ice vary.
·
Recent projections suggest that Arctic
summers could be ice-free (defined as ice extent less than 1 million square km) as early as 2025-2030.
Ecological
systems
·
In terrestrial ecosystems, the earlier timing of spring
events, and poleward and upward shifts in plant and animal ranges, have been
linked with high confidence to recent warming.
·
It is expected that most ecosystems will be
affected by higher atmospheric CO2 levels, combined with higher
global temperatures.
·
Overall, it is expected that climate change
will result in the extinction of many
species and reduced diversity of ecosystems.
·
Increases in atmospheric CO2 concentrations
have led to an increase in ocean acidity.
·
Dissolved CO2 increases
ocean acidity, which is measured by lower pH values.
·
Between 1750 to 2000, surface-ocean pH has
decreased by ≈0.1, from ≈8.2 to ≈8.1.
·
Surface-ocean pH has probably not been
below ≈8.1 during the past 2 million years.
·
Projections suggest that surface-ocean pH
could decrease by an additional 0.3–0.4 units by 2100.
Long-term
effects
·
On the timescale of centuries to millennia,
the magnitude of global warming will be determined primarily by anthropogenic
CO2 emissions.
·
This is due to carbon dioxide's very long
lifetime in the atmosphere.
·
Stabilizing global average temperature
would require reductions in anthropogenic CO2 emissions.
·
Reductions in emissions of non-CO2 anthropogenic
GHGs (e.g., methane and nitrous oxide) would also be necessary.
·
For CO2, anthropogenic emissions
would need to be reduced by more than 80% relative to their peak level.
·
Even if this were to be achieved, global
average temperatures would remain close to their highest level for many
centuries.
Large-scale
and abrupt impacts
·
Some large-scale changes could occur abruptly,
i.e., over a short time period, and might also be irreversible.
·
Scientific understanding of abrupt climate
change is generally poor.
·
However, the probability of abrupt changes
appears to be very low.
·
Factors that may increase the probability
of abrupt climate change include higher magnitudes of global warming, warming
that occurs more rapidly, and warming that is sustained over longer time
periods.
Observed and expected effects on social systems
·
Production of wheat and maize globally has
been impacted by climate change. While crop production has increased in some
mid-latitude regions such as the UK and Northeast China, economic losses due toextreme weather events have increased
globally.
·
There has been a shift from cold- to
heat-related mortality in some regions as a result of warming. Livelihoods of indigenous peoples of
the Arctic have been altered by climate change, and there is
emerging evidence of climate change impacts on livelihoods of indigenous peoples in
other regions.
·
Regional impacts of climate change are now observable
at more locations than before, on all continents and across ocean regions.
·
The future social impacts of climate change
will be uneven.
·
Many risks are expected to increase with
higher magnitudes of global warming.
·
All regions are at risk of experiencing
negative impacts.
·
Low-latitude, less developed areas face the
greatest risk.
·
Examples of impacts include:
·
Food: Crop production will probably be
negatively affected in low latitude countries, while effects at northern
latitudes may be positive or negative.
·
Global warming of around 4.6 °C
relative to pre-industrial levels could pose a large risk to global and
regional food security.
·
Health: Generally impacts will
be more negative than positive.
·
Impacts
include: the effects of extreme weather, leading to injury and loss of life; and
indirect effects, such as undernutrition brought on by crop failures.
Habitat
inundation
·
In small islands and mega deltas, inundation as a result of sea level rise
is expected to threaten vital infrastructure and human settlements.
Proposed policy responses to global warming
·
There are different views over what the
appropriate policy response to climate change should be.
·
These competing views weigh the benefits of
limiting emissions of greenhouse gases against the costs. In general, it seems
likely that climate change will impose greater damages and risks in poorer
regions.
Mitigation
·
Reducing the amount of future climate
change is called mitigation of
climate change.
·
The IPCC defines mitigation as activities
that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, or enhance the capacity of carbon sinks to absorb GHGs from the
atmosphere.
·
Climate mitigation also includes acts to
enhance natural sinks, such as reforestation.
·
In order to limit warming to within the
lower range described in the IPCC's "Summary Report for Policymakers"
it will be necessary to adopt policies that will limit greenhouse gas emissions
to one of several significantly different scenarios described in the full
report.
·
This will become more and more difficult
with each year of increasing volumes of emissions and even more drastic
measures will be required in later years to stabilize a desired atmospheric
concentration of greenhouse gases.
·
Energy-related carbon-dioxide (CO2)
emissions in 2010 were the highest in history, breaking the prior record set in
2008.
Adaptation
·
Other policy responses include adaptation to
climate change. Adaptation to climate change may be planned, either in reaction
to or anticipation of climate change, or spontaneous, i.e., without government
intervention.
·
Planned adaptation is already occurring on
a limited basis
·
The barriers, limits, and costs of future
adaptation are not fully understood.
·
A concept related to adaptation is "adaptive capacity", which is the ability
of a system (human, natural or managed) to adjust to climate change (including
climate variability and extremes) to moderate potential damages, to take
advantage of opportunities, or to cope with consequences.
·
Unmitigated climate change (i.e., future
climate change without efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions) would, in the
long term, be likely to exceed the capacity of natural, managed and human
systems to adapt.
·
Environmental organizations and public
figures have emphasized changes in the climate and the risks they entail, while
promoting adaptation to changes in infrastructural needs and emissions
reductions.
Climate engineering
·
Climate engineering (sometimes called by
the more expansive term 'geoengineering'), is the deliberate modification of
the climate. It has been investigated as a possible response to global warming,
e.g. by NASA] and the Royal Society.
·
A study from 2014 investigated the most common
climate engineering methods and concluded they are either ineffective or have
potentially severe side effects and cannot be stopped without causing rapid
climate change.
Discourse about global warming
Political
discussion
·
The ultimate objective of the Convention is
to prevent dangerous human interference of the climate system.
·
As is stated in the Convention, this
requires that GHG concentrations are stabilized in the atmosphere at a level
where ecosystems can
adapt naturally to climate change, food
production is not threatened, and economic
development can proceed in a sustainable fashion.
·
The Framework Convention was agreed in
1992, but since then, global emissions have risen.
·
During negotiations, the G77 (a lobbying group in the United
Nations representing 133 developing nations) pushed for a mandate
requiring developed countries to "[take] the lead" in reducing their
emissions.
·
This was justified on the basis that: the
developed world's emissions had contributed most to the stock of
GHGs in the atmosphere; per-capita emissions (i.e.,
emissions per head of population) were still relatively low in developing
countries; and the emissions of developing countries would grow to meet their
development needs.
·
This mandate was sustained in the Kyoto Protocol to the Framework
Convention, which entered into legal effect in 2005.
·
In ratifying the Kyoto Protocol, most
developed countries accepted legally binding commitments to limit their
emissions.
·
These first-round commitments expired in
2012.
·
US President George W. Bush rejected the treaty on the
basis that "it exempts 80% of the world, including major population
centers such as China and India, from compliance, and would cause serious harm
to the US economy."
·
Parties associated with the Accord (140
countries, as of November 2010) aim to limit the future increase in global mean
temperature to below 2 °C.
·
A preliminary assessment published in November
2010 by the United
Nations Environment Programme(UNEP) suggests a possible
"emissions gap" between the voluntary pledges made in the Accord and
the emissions cuts necessary to have a "likely" (greater than 66%
probability) chance of meeting the 2 °C objective.
·
The UNEP assessment takes the 2 °C objective
as being measured against the pre-industrial global mean temperature level.
·
To having a likely chance of meeting the 2 °C objective,
assessed studies generally indicated the need for global emissions to peak
before 2020, with substantial declines in emissions thereafter.
·
It produced an agreement, not a binding
treaty, that the Parties should take urgent action to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions to meet a goal of limiting global warming to 2 °C above
pre-industrial temperatures.
·
It also recognized the need to consider
strengthening the goal to a global average rise of 1.5 °C.
Scientific discussion
·
Most scientists agree that humans are
contributing to observed climate change.
·
A meta study of academic papers concerning
global warming, published between 1991 and 2011 and accessible from Web of Knowledge, found that among those whose
abstracts expressed a position on the cause of global warming, 97.2% supported
the consensus view that it is man made.
·
In an October 2011 paper published in the International Journal of Public Opinion Research,
researchers from George Mason University analyzed the results of a survey of
489 American scientists working in academia, government, and industry.
·
Of those surveyed, 97% agreed that that
global temperatures have risen over the past century and 84% agreed that
"human-induced greenhouse warming" is now occurring, only 5%
disagreeing that human activity is a significant cause of global warming.
·
National science academies have called on
world leaders for policies to cut global emissions.
·
In the scientific literature, there is a strong
consensus that global surface temperatures have increased in
recent decades and that the trend is caused mainly by human-induced emissions
of greenhouse gases.
Discussion
by the public and in popular media
·
The global warming
controversy refers to a variety of disputes, substantially more
pronounced in the popular
media than in the scientific literature, regarding the nature,
causes, and consequences of global warming.
·
Additional disputes concern estimates of climate sensitivity,
predictions of additional warming, and what the consequences of global warming
will be.
·
From 1990–1997 in the United States, conservative think
tanks mobilized to challenge the legitimacy of global warming as a social
problem.
·
Some people dispute aspects of climate
change science.
·
Some fossil fuel companies have scaled back
their efforts in recent years, or called for policies to reduce global
warming.
Surveys
of public opinion
·
Researchers at the University of Michigan
have found that the public's belief as to the causes of global warming depends
on the wording choice used in the
polls.
·
Over a third of the world's population was
unaware of global warming, with people in developing countries less aware than
those in developed, and
those in Africa the least aware.
·
Of those aware, Latin America leads in
belief that temperature changes are a result of human activities while Africa,
parts of Asia and the Middle East, and a few countries from the Former Soviet
Union lead in the opposite belief. There is a significant contrast of the
opinions of the concept and the appropriate response between Europe and the
United States.
·
Nick Pidgeon of Cardiff University said
that "results show the different stages of engagement about global warming
on each side of the Atlantic", adding, "The debate in Europe is about
what action needs to be taken, while many in the US still debate whether
climate change is happening."
·
A 2010 poll by the Office for
National Statistics found that 75% of UK respondents were at
least "fairly convinced" that the world's climate is changing,
compared to 87% in a similar survey in 2006.
·
A January 2011 ICM poll in the UK found 83% of
respondents viewed climate change as a current or imminent threat, while 14%
said it was no threat. Opinion was unchanged from an August 2009 poll asking
the same question, though there had been a slight polarisation of opposing
views.
·
By 2010, with 111 countries surveyed,
Gallup determined that there was a substantial decrease in the number of
Americans and Europeans who viewed global warming as a serious threat.
·
In the US, a little over half the population
(53%) now viewed it as a serious concern for either themselves or their
families; this was 10% below the 2008 poll (63%). Latin America had the biggest
rise in concern, with 73% saying global warming was a serious threat to their
families.
·
That global poll also found that people are
more likely to attribute global warming to human activities than to natural
causes, except in the USA where nearly half (47%) of the population attributed
global warming to natural causes.
·
According to 54% of those questioned,
global warming featured top of the perceived global threats.
·
In a January 2013 survey, Pew found that
69% of Americans say there is solid evidence that the Earth's average
temperature has been getting warmer over the past few decades, up six points
since November 2011 and 12 points since 2009.
·
According to Erik M. Conway, global warming became
the dominant popular term after June 1988, when NASA climate scientist James Hansen used the term in a testimony
to Congress
·
when he said: "global warming has
reached a level such that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a
cause and effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and the observed
warming."
·
Conway claims that this testimony was
widely reported in the media and subsequently global warming became
the commonly used term by both the press and in public discourse.
·
However, he also points out that
"global climate change" is the more scientifically accurate term,
because changes in Earth systems are not limited to surface temperatures.